Showing posts with label Identity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Identity. Show all posts

September 15, 2012

Double Vision: Revisiting the Container of the East-West Encounter

My essay, "Double Vision: Revisiting the Container of the East-West Encounter" (written in October 2011), appeared in the first issue of the Journal of East West Psychology Israel. Scroll down for the Hebrew translation on this page and for the (original) English article here. Am also reposting the latter below.


Double Vision: Revisiting the Container of the East-West Encounter

Abstract 
A pure space of East-West encounter is not conceivable today, since successive encounters have already transformed both the East and the West into hyphenated or hybrid spatialities. Creating a more holistic and authentic personal spiritual culture requires that I make conscious all the narratives, traditions, and beliefs, that form part my experience. The ecstatic path is one trajectory to seeing the East-West as a place signifying doubleness and globality rather than as indicative of polarities.

***

The Thursday before I wrote this essay, I went to a 5Rhythms class and tried to dance my way into the two polarities of “East” and “West” as they play out within me. I was trying to replicate a tantric experiment I had found in Anand’s The Art of Everyday Ecstasy (1998) where an integration between the inner feminine and the inner masculine follows when one embodies, first, one’s female or anima side, and then, one’s male or animus side. For me, dancing as my inner woman and as my inner man had proved to be particularly revelatory; I was hoping for a similar breakthrough during 5Rhythms.

I had no success in embodying the “East” polarity in me. The music was not helping, but also my head was asking too many questions: “What do you mean, East? Which East? Do you want to dance as the girl from Ranchi, the girl born in a Marwari family, the hip Delhi girl, or what? Which of the values/behaviors that you associate with each of these identity-positions do you want to become? And do you really want to become these role values/behaviors?” Not surprisingly, I gave up quite soon, and began to enjoy just moving, just dancing, just being the body in the body.

It was a while later that a piece of music featuring the bansuri came on. My body heard it before my mind did, and I found myself creating the classical dance movements and gestures I had practiced as a child, and later, as part of the college dance team. I realized that my body knows how to move to Eastern rhythms, and it knows how to move to Western rhythms, and it takes great pleasure in rhythms that combine these styles.

The demarcation between East and West is less clear when we are not talking about music or dance. In life, don’t we all occupy a hyphenated or hybrid space: “East-West” rather than either “East” or “West”? For, East and West—which have never been static formations unlike the concepts formulated about them—are today, more than ever before, not discrete, independent spatialities. My brother streaming Dexter online to watch in Chennai; a white Bollywood blogger living in Minnesota; a Gurdjieff Movements Group in Kasauli; mud altars for Ram, Sita, Hanuman at a yoga studio in Chicago: these are just a small part of the intense intermixing that marks our contemporary cultural moment. The hybrid cultures that are emerging—this includes religio-spiritual cultures and containing myths for individuals, groups, and communities—are very much inter-, trans-, and multi- versions to those located in the older polarities of East and West.

My Containing Myths 

I find that my personal spiritual culture is made up of religious and spiritual beliefs from many traditions: they come from the East, from the West, from places that fall in between, and from directions that are neither East nor West. An important task right now for me is to make these beliefs and traditions conscious so that I can consciously choose and create a containing myth to hold me during this part of my transformation/passage, using procedures of inter-, trans-, and multi-.

My earliest containing myth was shaped by the framed images and figurines of gods and goddesses in my mother’s puja room. A large poster-picture of Lakshmi, Saraswati, and Ganesh sat in the center: for a long time, I was not aware that the trio holds particular significance for the business community, being divine commissioners of material welfare. I was not aware of belonging to any specific tradition of Hinduism; I did not know that different traditions existed. I just knew that I was supposed to fold my hands in a pranam before the deities in the morning before I left for school, and that if I had a test or exam that day, I was supposed to wait for Mum to give me a prasad of curd and batasha . On Diwali, we performed a havan and Lakshmi aarti : I did not know that these two rituals came from two different traditions and that most of my classmates did not celebrate Diwali in the same way. My parents did not ask us to engage in religious practices any more than this and this, pretty much, was the extent of my religious practice.

I took it for granted that the Gayatri Mantra would protect me. I did not think twice about the extensive Griha Pravesh puja we performed when our family moved into our own house. And, despite being non-Bengalis, of course we visited the pandals in different neighborhoods every Durga Puja. There was no other way to be. Everyone around me was either Hindu, or I perceived them as such (for example, the young indigenous girl working as a domestic at our house). Hinduism was the default affiliation in that world.

At the same time, I did not feel particularly connected to the larger trends of Hinduism. Our family was not big on visiting temples and I remember feeling uncomfortable and at a loss whenever I did find myself in one. This feeling intensified when I visited my extended family on my father’s side: they owned their participation in religion in a way that was unfamiliar to me, and they even sang different songs during the aarti! By this point I had learnt that Mum was not a Marwari, i.e., she was born in a different community from Papa’s, and, I think in part internalizing her discomfiture around orthodox Marwariness, I was embarrassed to be so different. Yet, at other times, especially when I won academic achievement or poetry recitation prizes at the Agrawal Sabha—our clan organization—I was happy I was not like the other Agrawal girls.

I think I realized that I was being raised in a way that enabled me to bypass (relatively) the patriarchal and misogynistic attitudes that limited most of the other girls in my community. Mum encouraging, even expecting me to study and to top the class. Mum and Papa performing the Diwali havan as equals; Mum leading us all into the chanting of mantras. Mum and not Papa in charge of the household accounts. Still, it was not easy to not feel like an outsider because of our put-together, collated, non-traditional family culture.

It is only now, in writing this, that I recognize how I have been confusing my community’s culture and values with my family’s culture and values. I was raised amongst people who were conservative and narrow-minded, yes. But my parents, and especially my mother—while they did not outright challenge the norms of our society—did try to create a more open, enabling environment for my brother and me. This sifting through is, I can see, another important task for me.

Much later, when I was in college and people asked me which community I belonged to, I would always say my dad was Marwari and my mother was Punjabi.

Then there was school: an Anglican convent-run institution, where we recited the Lord’s Prayer during the morning assembly and memorized biblical morals as part of our Moral Science class. Industrial Ranchi—where I grew up— was a cosmopolitan place in its own small-town way. Early on, the idea that there were multiple ways of being was brought home to me, although my situatedness in the Marwari community made it difficult not to let my seeing of these “others” be colored with classism and even a tinge of racism and xenophobia. The nexus between mainstream Hinduism and a fundamentalist intolerance of the other, of course, came to a head in 1992 with the demolition of the Babri Masjid, although it did not unfold itself to me until the Gujarat genocide of 2002.

Being an avid reader, I devoured stories about gods and goddesses from the Puranic tradition as much as those about the lives of Christian saints. The 1980s were also when the national television serialized as docudramas the two Hindu epics, Ramayana and Mahabharata. These tellings affixed themselves as standard versions of the epics in the modern national imaginary, and funneled into a kind of group consciousness that was emerging around a rigidifying Hindu identity.

The deployment of Hindutva by fascistic rightwing groups was a major reason I shied away from the rituals and practices of Hinduism as a young adult. Yet Hindutva, as we have come to know it, is nothing but the political expression of a culture-wide intolerance and hostility towards other communities I had sensed in the Hindu middle classes during my growing up years.

My first job was in India’s capital city, Delhi. While living here, the places I went to, to come home to myself, included Hazrat Nizamuddin Auliya’s dargah, the Gurdwara Sahib a few blocks from my apartment, and the courtyard of Jama Masjid. Delhi exposed me to the syncretic traditions of South Asia, but I was still coming at them from a postcolonial secularist perspective that was not entirely convinced by, or of, the mystical and the metaphysical. In time, I started opening to the sacred, secretively at first and more boldly lately, and explored spiritual ideas and practices stemming from different traditions within Buddhism, yoga, Native American spirituality, Jungian psychology, shamanism, tarot, etcetera.

Double (Multiple) Encounters

As someone who inhabits many or at least two worlds, I feel that I need to conceptualize spirituality doubly, if not multiply. Such a doubled/manifold conception/knowing is necessary for any migrant to feel at home, and aren’t we all migrants in this world? It is in finding parallels and correspondences, and in creating liminal, syncretic, transversal conceptions, that the container of the East-West encounter seems most useful to me.

Writing this essay has given me the opportunity to look at my earliest containing myth in a very deep way. I had a resistance to making my narratives of childhood up-to-date with my felt adult experiences, and had not realized that this was an area I needed healing in. To create a more holistic spiritual culture/containing myth for myself, I must unloose the religious traditions I was born into from their problematic cultural-political manifestations and understand them. Then I can make a decision about how to own them. I am grateful to be a student at a moment when many paradigms are available to me to learn from. I have just begun studying Advaita Vedanta and trying to hold nondual awareness in my everyday life, and will soon begin studying with a teacher in the Western mysteries tradition. I am feeling called to volunteer to be an abortion doula so I can help women hold the mysteries of grief and love. My art has been to dark places and I would like to be able to go with it into other ecstatic modes as well.

The path I find myself resonating most strongly with today is that of the ecstatics. Ecstatics traverse all dichotomies in their ecstasy of oneness, and the dichotomies and disconnects of East and West fall through along with all others. Poetry, music, dancing dissolve the perception of separation for the journeyer, and allow them to experience the knowledge of the Self, and to practice this knowledge, in a very complete way. Abida Parveen (2010) sings Bulleh Shah, “Sanu ishq laga hai pyaar da.” I am smitten by the Beloved. “That the dancer is lost, and only the dance remains,” says Osho (Hillmann, 1978). Gabrielle Roth (2011) writes, “We dance to shed skins, tear off masks, crack molds, and experience the breakdown—the shattering of borders between body, heart and mind, between genders and generations, between nations and nomads. We are the transitional generation.”

Reality is unknowable, but love and compassion, I believe, are the only reality, and I would like to be (in) love and compassion more completely. At the same time, I want to integrate my analytical self onto the spiritual path, so that all intellectual enquiry I engage in is an enquiry of love. Such an East-West encounter would truly be a global encounter.  

References 

Anand, M. (1998). The art of everyday ecstasy: The seven tantric keys for bringing passion, spirit, and joy into every part of your life. New York: Broadway Books.

Hillmann, R. (Director). (1978). Osho bhagwan - the movie [Motion Picture]. Retrieved from http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1916549395176220097

Shah, B. Nigah-e-darwaishaan [Recorded by Abida Parveen]. On Coke Studio – Season 3. (2010). 

Roth, G. (2011, May 16). The spiritual power of dance. Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com

March 13, 2012

Maharajas and me

Last week I went with a friend to the Asian Art Museum, primarily to see the exhibit “Maharaja: The Splendor of India’s Royal Courts”. It is an exhaustively curated exhibition, showcasing art and artifacts from several different collections, and spans the rulerships of many precolonial to colonial periods and many regions across the Indian subcontinent. The last section of the exhibit focused on the colonial era: the time when more and more kingdoms were coming under the sway of the East India Company and, later, the British government. I was surprised to find how affected I was at seeing artworks that depicted the gradual transformation in the Indian rulers’ attire, courts, and roles. Many rulers of the period seemed to have a dual role: a more traditional role (often wearing traditional garb) on the one hand, and, on the other, a role depicting their Westernizing identities (often wearing immaculate Europeanized attire, in Europe). It brought to mind the dual role I often find myself playing between here and there (the "here" and "there" having changed and even collapsed over time), and the change of clothes that often marks it.

Yeshwant Rao Holkar II of Indore. By
Bernard Boutet de Monvel. 1929.
Oil on canvas. 

Some rulers, wearing more ornate dresses and flashier and larger jewels than their predecessors, seemed to be figureheads being exoticized and put on display by the colonial rule.

I was particularly upset by the footage of King George V of England being crowned Emperor of India in Delhi. The ceremony bore close resemblance to post-independence state ceremonies such as Republic Day and Independence Day celebrations, which, in this light, and because of the many failures of the postcolonial Indian state to live up to its ideals of democracy, equality and justice, appeared to me mockeries, false celebrations.


Until now, I have been pretty secure in my postcolonial identity and did not consciously experience distress on account of India’s colonial past: the past was past. My strong emotions on this occasion contained a surprise. I found myself wondering if—it appears to me that—colonization remains a wound in the cultural unconscious of India: a wound we as a nation are no longer—or not often—willing to look at because we think we have ‘moved on’, or ‘grown up’, or that enough time has passed.

Personally, I was interested in why this particular wound/complex surfaced for me right now. Could it be because I am engaging with the complex task of formulating my personal spiritual culture, as I explore what was and what was not my heritage in the 'East' and as I encounter 'new' traditions in the 'West'? Aligning dual or multiple roles/identities versus being typecast into the 'exotic' or the 'Westernized' remain real, very present concerns for me, as for the many non-Western immigrant/diasporic peoples living in the West throughout the world.

Jung talks about the most important problems of life being fundamentally insoluble; he says we outgrow them upon reaching a new level of consciousness. And, I believe, before a new level of consciousness is arrived at, the unconscious must bring newer buried, hidden 'problems' to the surface.

I was also thinking about what would it mean for me, in this instance, to "let things happen in the psyche." The fact that I am staying with and observing my emotions and “fragments of fantasy” and writing about them seems important. For now I will let it be at that.

June 24, 2009

In Chicago the weekend before last

Don't quite fit into the narratives of desi writing (and, guess what, one of my panels at Kriti was What If I Don't Want to Write About India) but there was something about being among South Asian writers. Such as discovering I am not quite done being one either. No, I haven't been trying to escape my "culture", but certain modes of writing which it seems "Indian writing" has made a culture out of. Am I less Indian because they are more so? And other such anxieties about forefathers; especially forefathers. My literary heritage - ill-fittingly and not-so-snugly there I stand - after Kolatkar and Jussawala. But what about mothers of my choosing. Or sisters. Or queens. Or gay boys. Or crazy playwrights. Or companions.

All such anxieties are in all such heads, I know. Identities, I told a friend yesterday, are dubious. But isn't it difficult to remember to be cunning and edgy when using identities. Isn't it easy to want to become an identity.


But Amitava Kumar during his Q&A reminded us that we don't have to choose. Audiences - and by extension, meanings. Different meanings can be made on different occasions. Now I sound like this; any other moment, I will revel in sounding a clarion for something else. Then something else.

Don't let that deflate you.

At the Not-India panel we talked about much more.

June 19, 2009

blog conversations

In Feb, this interview with Kinjal Dagli - which had then bemused me, and which already seems dated, what with twitter and other "social media" added to the fray (or I in the fray, adding and subtracting). The feature, written up by Kalindi Sheth, here.

***

KD: Your identity. Your name, age, profession, and where you live.

Monica Mody, writer, currently in the MFA program at the University of Notre Dame. I lived in Delhi from 2003-08.

KD: When did you start this blog? Why? What is it/does it aim to be about? Why such a title?

This is my second blog - I started posting on it in May 2008.

By Aug 2007 I had started to feel that "In Small Pieces", my first blog, did not reflect who I was any longer. I had started the latter in Sep 2004 when I was a very different person. Despite blogs being such eccentric, changeable creatures, I had somehow outgrown it.

Blogs for me are nets where I collect my writings, thoughts, observations - or such things as catch my eye. This is how I was using "In Small Pieces" - and funnily enough, I use "An Imperfect Blog" in a similar manner - as a multifarious net.

The blog, poor thing, has wanted to be about just this one thing or just that, at various points, but failed. So it has to be all and serve in many different capacities. It is the doppelganger of Monica the writer. Monica the queer feminist. Monica the movie-lover, the book-lover, the cat-lover. Monica the beyond labels. Etc.

It is an imperfect blog. I update it idiosyncratically. Often or not very often, depending on my moods/what is happening in my "real" life. Blogging is not my religion as it is for many people, and I used to feel quite upset with myself because of that. Peer pressure. But now finally, I own its imperfection.

KD: What does blogging do for/mean to you? Do you feel Indian women express themselves better on blogs; is it an outlet for just the modern, i-have-something-to-say woman, or can it be used as a tool for those hitherto unheard as well?

The connections one makes with other bloggers - this whole world of comments and communication - that is remarkable.

Is there a unified identity called "Indian women"? If you ever run into it, point me to it too. What do you mean by a "modern, i-have-something-to-say woman"? Are "less modern" women without things to say? Who is "modern" anyway? Please examine your categories.

Blogging is a tool. It is not messianic; it is not the solution to all troubles. Yes, it has allowed many adolescents, women, queer people, people with crazy/interesting hobbies, old women, right wing fundamentalists, you name it - to record their thoughts/observations and articulate them - and find sympathizers/allies out there - sometimes much more easily than in their immediate surroundings. Which means that blogging can be a progressive or regressive force depending on who is blogging.

These two processes of (a) articulating the self, and (b) finding a community have been/can be extremely powerful for certain women - women whose experiences of power might otherwise be limited. It does not matter whether these women are "modern" or "not modern" - as long as they understand the potential of this tool - as long as they blog.

Blogging should not be understood "as a tool for" but "as a tool by".

KD: Finally, is your online identity different from your offline persona? I notice that unlike several other blogs, you've put up your photograph and use your true name, right? Does it make you feel at all vulnerable that just about anybody can see/monitor you?

The self, interesting enough, does not need to be fully disclosed when blogging.

Is my online identity different from my "offline persona" (I love this!)? Of course. I monitor what goes on my blog - what I put on it - precisely because I am aware that it is a public realm. The lines I draw protect my personal life to the extent I want to keep it "private" from the "public eye". What else should I feel vulnerable about? Having certain beliefs and convictions, which might be unpopular/unacceptable in certain quarters? No. I don't worry about that because I know I have the resources to be relatively worry-free.

Many people don't have this privilege, my privileges. These could be people who, in their "offline" lives, are forced - because of gender/ sexuality/ caste/ class/ hetero-patriarchy/ other power structures - to be too nice too coy (too Indian). Who feel safer, in their virtual anonymous avatars, to express their real selves. That is sad and terrible. And yet, is it - entirely?

November 30, 2008

Us, Mumbai, Them, Us

I met T. outside the lift in the library today. T., a management student from Lahore whom I had first met, ironically, on the morning of Nov 26. I hadn't heard about the Mumbai attacks then, or maybe the first shots had not been fired at CST yet. The world was different, but how different was it?

That day, in the student lounge, we talked after I'd heard him speak on the phone and - as so often happens here: we recognize each other and feel strangely happy and foolish and make bold - asked, "Are you from India?" People from Pakistan and India sound quite similar. People from certain parts of Pakistan and certain parts of India. We do. And I felt the same naïve kin-affection for T. that I feel for V. from Bangalore and P. from Calcutta. At least P. and I have things in common. Others from India(n subcontinent) have successfully made a claim on my sweet affections even if we'd never exchange two words in Bangalore or Calcutta. Yes, it is silly. I discovered this halka sa chauvinistic side to myself when I came to Notre Dame.

It turned out T. was also an ex-student of a friend's husband who teaches at LUMS. I've never met the latter, but it was comforting to hear T. reminisce about his class. Then I hazarded a "Let's meet up one of these days," and felt a little foolish again, and didn't even think about T. till I ran into him today outside the lift.

He didn't meet my eye and mumbled something, a greeting. My smile ricocheted off; he was already looking away. We stood stiffly in the lift. I wanted to say something to break the ice. Like, hey, I don't blame you at all. Or, no hard feelings. Or, it's okay. Anything would have sounded terrible, inappropriate.

So I just stepped out at the fifth floor with a half-nod, an almost-nod, an absentminded nod as though I was nodding to myself.

October 18, 2008

how often?

"People change and forget to tell each other." - Lillian Hellman

May 30, 2008

City Girl

A few days ago, walking on the stripped concrete roof of the apartment complex to which my family had recently shifted, I realized how odd it was that I was eager these days to read up, ask questions, and learn about Goa (where I hope to make a home one day), but had not had a similar curiosity about the city of my birth.

My relationship with Ranchi has always been strange, marked by a huge disconnect.

Many years ago, trusting and ingenuous, I went from home to school and school to home, riding a school bus, with no thought to what was going on outside. I was shaped by the pedagogy of the time and place. Children were neither taught nor encouraged to be inquisitive about material realities, nor engage with the world, not by our families and not at school. The focus of education was on performance in the classroom -- to do better at school subjects, get higher marks -- which I was very good at.

I grew up a dreamy, bookish, apolitical child, the kind who devoured unabridged Dickens and Kipling but had but a vague idea about the space she inhabited – its pre-Independence and post-Independence history, economic history, political aspirations, weave of inter-ethnic relations, clannishness based on region of origin, hierarchies based on caste and class. The disconnect with “life outside” was so tremendous that I didn’t think it could have any implication for my life.

And in a way it didn’t. In 1998, I left for Bangalore to study law, returning periodically during term holidays. Then I moved to Delhi to work and into a whole new life consisting of a shared rented apartment, friends, and increasingly non mainstream ideas, since we found we wanted different things in and for our lives than the mainstream.

Ranchi was a place I returned to just to spend time with my family. Most of my school friends had married and moved elsewhere. My interactions with the family’s friends were quite often not about me as much as about what a daughter of the family who has made it should look like. My real life in Delhi was carefully folded away from the scrutiny of that slice of the Ranchi society we moved around in.

Sometimes, when I went back, I took independent excursions. One Christmas, I walked to a beautiful brick church. Once I met the editor of a women’s magazine at a public lecture and later went to her house, where she talked me into getting a year’s subscription of the magazine (of which only a copy or two turned up in the mail). These were thrilling moments. I was breaking away from the expectations and doing what was not easily understandable for a girl of my “family background”, and just about tolerated for its eccentricity because, normally, my family was respectable.

I’ll be 28 this July and am choosing to be rootless for now. After almost five years in Delhi, a desire to replant myself cropped up. So I am in Goa for the summer (but not in Baga or Anjuna or even a pristine South Goa beach, before someone pipes up “holiday”!). The day after I reached, a friend who has returned to Goa after studying and a short stint of work said to me, we have to go back to where we come from; we have to deal with the problems of that place; we have to help in the solving of those problems. I think he meant this is how we can find the “home” we are all looking for.

I’ve been thinking about this, especially on my recent trip to Ranchi. It’s difficult to love my birth-town sometimes, I get so frustrated by the things that are happening there. Yet, that is home, the first home, and I have to find some way to go back. So perhaps I will begin by asking questions. Who, what, where, why? Maybe I won’t find the people who have these answers soon, maybe the answers themselves would take some time coming. Then again, maybe my questions will show the way for more questions. And that could be one way back.


For Nancy Mairs, last encountered in the stuttering adventure of her essay.